It’s a Wrap: Mapping On-Skin Input to Off-Skin Displays

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportKonferencebidrag i proceedingsForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

It’s a Wrap: Mapping On-Skin Input to Off-Skin Displays. / Bergstrom-Lehtovirta, Joanna; Hornbæk, Kasper; Boring, Sebastian.

CHI '18 Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, 2018. 564.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportKonferencebidrag i proceedingsForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Bergstrom-Lehtovirta, J, Hornbæk, K & Boring, S 2018, It’s a Wrap: Mapping On-Skin Input to Off-Skin Displays. i CHI '18 Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems., 564, Association for Computing Machinery, ACM CHI 2018, Montreal, Canada, 21/04/2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174138

APA

Bergstrom-Lehtovirta, J., Hornbæk, K., & Boring, S. (2018). It’s a Wrap: Mapping On-Skin Input to Off-Skin Displays. I CHI '18 Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems [564] Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174138

Vancouver

Bergstrom-Lehtovirta J, Hornbæk K, Boring S. It’s a Wrap: Mapping On-Skin Input to Off-Skin Displays. I CHI '18 Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery. 2018. 564 https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174138

Author

Bergstrom-Lehtovirta, Joanna ; Hornbæk, Kasper ; Boring, Sebastian. / It’s a Wrap: Mapping On-Skin Input to Off-Skin Displays. CHI '18 Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, 2018.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{c9f9c6b91a424cb49df09ba8a57294a4,
title = "It’s a Wrap:: Mapping On-Skin Input to Off-Skin Displays",
abstract = "Input on the skin is emerging as an interaction style. At CHI2012, Coyle and colleagues identified an increase in the senseof agency (SoA) as one benefit of skin input. However, theirstudy only compared skin input to button presses and has not,to our knowledge, been replicated. Therefore, we had 24 participantscompare skin input to both button presses and touchpadinput, measuring SoA using the Libet Clock paradigm.We replicate previous findings regarding increased SoA inskin versus button input and also find that SoA for skin is significantlyincreased compared to touchpad input. Interviewdata addressing subjective experience further support thesefindings. We discuss agency and the experiences associatedwith skin input, as well as differences to input with non-skindevices.",
author = "Joanna Bergstrom-Lehtovirta and Kasper Hornb{\ae}k and Sebastian Boring",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1145/3173574.3174138",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781450356206",
booktitle = "CHI '18 Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery",
note = "ACM CHI 2018 ; Conference date: 21-04-2018 Through 26-04-2018",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - It’s a Wrap:

T2 - ACM CHI 2018

AU - Bergstrom-Lehtovirta, Joanna

AU - Hornbæk, Kasper

AU - Boring, Sebastian

PY - 2018/4/20

Y1 - 2018/4/20

N2 - Input on the skin is emerging as an interaction style. At CHI2012, Coyle and colleagues identified an increase in the senseof agency (SoA) as one benefit of skin input. However, theirstudy only compared skin input to button presses and has not,to our knowledge, been replicated. Therefore, we had 24 participantscompare skin input to both button presses and touchpadinput, measuring SoA using the Libet Clock paradigm.We replicate previous findings regarding increased SoA inskin versus button input and also find that SoA for skin is significantlyincreased compared to touchpad input. Interviewdata addressing subjective experience further support thesefindings. We discuss agency and the experiences associatedwith skin input, as well as differences to input with non-skindevices.

AB - Input on the skin is emerging as an interaction style. At CHI2012, Coyle and colleagues identified an increase in the senseof agency (SoA) as one benefit of skin input. However, theirstudy only compared skin input to button presses and has not,to our knowledge, been replicated. Therefore, we had 24 participantscompare skin input to both button presses and touchpadinput, measuring SoA using the Libet Clock paradigm.We replicate previous findings regarding increased SoA inskin versus button input and also find that SoA for skin is significantlyincreased compared to touchpad input. Interviewdata addressing subjective experience further support thesefindings. We discuss agency and the experiences associatedwith skin input, as well as differences to input with non-skindevices.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046937743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/3173574.3174138

DO - 10.1145/3173574.3174138

M3 - Article in proceedings

SN - 9781450356206

BT - CHI '18 Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

PB - Association for Computing Machinery

Y2 - 21 April 2018 through 26 April 2018

ER -

ID: 195259853