Struggles for Recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of its Discontents

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Standard

Struggles for Recognition : The Liberal International Order and the Merger of its Discontents. / Adler-Nissen, Rebecca; Zarakol, Ayse.

I: International Organization, Bind 75, Nr. 2, 2021, s. 611–34.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Adler-Nissen, R & Zarakol, A 2021, 'Struggles for Recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of its Discontents', International Organization, bind 75, nr. 2, s. 611–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000454

APA

Adler-Nissen, R., & Zarakol, A. (2021). Struggles for Recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of its Discontents. International Organization, 75(2), 611–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000454

Vancouver

Adler-Nissen R, Zarakol A. Struggles for Recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of its Discontents. International Organization. 2021;75(2):611–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000454

Author

Adler-Nissen, Rebecca ; Zarakol, Ayse. / Struggles for Recognition : The Liberal International Order and the Merger of its Discontents. I: International Organization. 2021 ; Bind 75, Nr. 2. s. 611–34.

Bibtex

@article{3d8df5394ea749d280c7475a7aa5a01e,
title = "Struggles for Recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of its Discontents",
abstract = "The Liberal International Order (LIO) is currently undermined not only by states such as Russia but also by voters in the West. We argue that both veins of discontent are driven by resentment towards the LIO{\textquoteright}s status hierarchy, rather than just economic grievances. Approaching discontent historically and sociologically, we show that there are two strains of recognition struggles against the LIO: one in the core of the West, driven by populist politicians and their voters, and one on the semi-periphery, fuelled by competitively authoritarian governments and their supporters. At this particular moment in history, these struggles are digitally, ideologically and organisationally interconnected in their criticism of LIO institutions, amplifying each other. The LIO is thus being hollowed out from within at a time when it is also facing some of its greatest external challenges. ",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, Populism, Recognition, International Relations Theory, West, Russia, Digital, Liberalism, Liberal international order, Authoritarianism, Stigma, Deviance, semi-periphery, Discontent, International Relations, global governance, Rising powers, Identity, Sovereignty, Nationalism",
author = "Rebecca Adler-Nissen and Ayse Zarakol",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1017/S0020818320000454",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "611–34",
journal = "International Organization",
issn = "0020-8183",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Struggles for Recognition

T2 - The Liberal International Order and the Merger of its Discontents

AU - Adler-Nissen, Rebecca

AU - Zarakol, Ayse

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - The Liberal International Order (LIO) is currently undermined not only by states such as Russia but also by voters in the West. We argue that both veins of discontent are driven by resentment towards the LIO’s status hierarchy, rather than just economic grievances. Approaching discontent historically and sociologically, we show that there are two strains of recognition struggles against the LIO: one in the core of the West, driven by populist politicians and their voters, and one on the semi-periphery, fuelled by competitively authoritarian governments and their supporters. At this particular moment in history, these struggles are digitally, ideologically and organisationally interconnected in their criticism of LIO institutions, amplifying each other. The LIO is thus being hollowed out from within at a time when it is also facing some of its greatest external challenges.

AB - The Liberal International Order (LIO) is currently undermined not only by states such as Russia but also by voters in the West. We argue that both veins of discontent are driven by resentment towards the LIO’s status hierarchy, rather than just economic grievances. Approaching discontent historically and sociologically, we show that there are two strains of recognition struggles against the LIO: one in the core of the West, driven by populist politicians and their voters, and one on the semi-periphery, fuelled by competitively authoritarian governments and their supporters. At this particular moment in history, these struggles are digitally, ideologically and organisationally interconnected in their criticism of LIO institutions, amplifying each other. The LIO is thus being hollowed out from within at a time when it is also facing some of its greatest external challenges.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - Populism

KW - Recognition

KW - International Relations Theory

KW - West

KW - Russia

KW - Digital

KW - Liberalism

KW - Liberal international order

KW - Authoritarianism

KW - Stigma

KW - Deviance

KW - semi-periphery

KW - Discontent

KW - International Relations

KW - global governance

KW - Rising powers

KW - Identity

KW - Sovereignty

KW - Nationalism

U2 - 10.1017/S0020818320000454

DO - 10.1017/S0020818320000454

M3 - Journal article

VL - 75

SP - 611

EP - 634

JO - International Organization

JF - International Organization

SN - 0020-8183

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 244083118