The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk: a cohort study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk : a cohort study. / Wanders, Johanna O. P.; van Gils, Carla H.; Karssemeijer, Nico; Holland, Katharina; Kallenberg, Michiel; Peeters, Petra H. M.; Nielsen, Mads; Lillholm, Martin.

I: Breast Cancer Research, Bind 20, 36, 2018.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Wanders, JOP, van Gils, CH, Karssemeijer, N, Holland, K, Kallenberg, M, Peeters, PHM, Nielsen, M & Lillholm, M 2018, 'The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk: a cohort study', Breast Cancer Research, bind 20, 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-018-0961-7

APA

Wanders, J. O. P., van Gils, C. H., Karssemeijer, N., Holland, K., Kallenberg, M., Peeters, P. H. M., ... Lillholm, M. (2018). The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk: a cohort study. Breast Cancer Research, 20, [36]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-018-0961-7

Vancouver

Wanders JOP, van Gils CH, Karssemeijer N, Holland K, Kallenberg M, Peeters PHM o.a. The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk: a cohort study. Breast Cancer Research. 2018;20. 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-018-0961-7

Author

Wanders, Johanna O. P. ; van Gils, Carla H. ; Karssemeijer, Nico ; Holland, Katharina ; Kallenberg, Michiel ; Peeters, Petra H. M. ; Nielsen, Mads ; Lillholm, Martin. / The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk : a cohort study. I: Breast Cancer Research. 2018 ; Bind 20.

Bibtex

@article{6004ac6ee9f94356856998c69e172936,
title = "The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk: a cohort study",
abstract = "Background Texture patterns have been shown to improve breast cancer risk segregation in addition to area-based mammographic density. The additional value of texture pattern scores on top of volumetric mammographic density measures in a large screening cohort has never been studied. Methods Volumetric mammographic density and texture pattern scores were assessed automatically for the first available digital mammography (DM) screening examination of 51,400 women (50–75 years of age) participating in the Dutch biennial breast cancer screening program between 2003 and 2011. The texture assessment method was developed in a previous study and validated in the current study. Breast cancer information was obtained from the screening registration system and through linkage with the Netherlands Cancer Registry. All screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed at the first available digital screening examination were excluded. During a median follow-up period of 4.2 (interquartile range (IQR) 2.0–6.2) years, 301 women were diagnosed with breast cancer. The associations between texture pattern scores, volumetric breast density measures and breast cancer risk were determined using Cox proportional hazard analyses. Discriminatory performance was assessed using c-indices. Results The median age of the women at the time of the first available digital mammography examination was 56 years (IQR 51–63). Texture pattern scores were positively associated with breast cancer risk (hazard ratio (HR) 3.16 (95{\%} CI 2.16–4.62) (p value for trend <0.001), for quartile (Q) 4 compared to Q1). The c-index of texture was 0.61 (95{\%} CI 0.57–0.64). Dense volume and percentage dense volume showed positive associations with breast cancer risk (HR 1.85 (95{\%} CI 1.32–2.59) (p value for trend <0.001) and HR 2.17 (95{\%} CI 1.51–3.12) (p value for trend <0.001), respectively, for Q4 compared to Q1). When adding texture measures to models with dense volume or percentage dense volume, c-indices increased from 0.56 (95{\%} CI 0.53–0.59) to 0.62 (95{\%} CI 0.58–0.65) (p < 0.001) and from 0.58 (95{\%} CI 0.54–0.61) to 0.60 (95{\%} CI 0.57–0.63) (p = 0.054), respectively. Conclusions Deep-learning-based texture pattern scores, measured automatically on digital mammograms, are associated with breast cancer risk, independently of volumetric mammographic density, and augment the capacity to discriminate between future breast cancer and non-breast cancer cases.",
keywords = "Volumetric mammographic breast density, Texture pattern scores, Breast cancer risk",
author = "Wanders, {Johanna O. P.} and {van Gils}, {Carla H.} and Nico Karssemeijer and Katharina Holland and Michiel Kallenberg and Peeters, {Petra H. M.} and Mads Nielsen and Martin Lillholm",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1186/s13058-018-0961-7",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
journal = "Breast Cancer Research (Online Edition)",
issn = "1465-5411",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk

T2 - a cohort study

AU - Wanders, Johanna O. P.

AU - van Gils, Carla H.

AU - Karssemeijer, Nico

AU - Holland, Katharina

AU - Kallenberg, Michiel

AU - Peeters, Petra H. M.

AU - Nielsen, Mads

AU - Lillholm, Martin

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Background Texture patterns have been shown to improve breast cancer risk segregation in addition to area-based mammographic density. The additional value of texture pattern scores on top of volumetric mammographic density measures in a large screening cohort has never been studied. Methods Volumetric mammographic density and texture pattern scores were assessed automatically for the first available digital mammography (DM) screening examination of 51,400 women (50–75 years of age) participating in the Dutch biennial breast cancer screening program between 2003 and 2011. The texture assessment method was developed in a previous study and validated in the current study. Breast cancer information was obtained from the screening registration system and through linkage with the Netherlands Cancer Registry. All screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed at the first available digital screening examination were excluded. During a median follow-up period of 4.2 (interquartile range (IQR) 2.0–6.2) years, 301 women were diagnosed with breast cancer. The associations between texture pattern scores, volumetric breast density measures and breast cancer risk were determined using Cox proportional hazard analyses. Discriminatory performance was assessed using c-indices. Results The median age of the women at the time of the first available digital mammography examination was 56 years (IQR 51–63). Texture pattern scores were positively associated with breast cancer risk (hazard ratio (HR) 3.16 (95% CI 2.16–4.62) (p value for trend <0.001), for quartile (Q) 4 compared to Q1). The c-index of texture was 0.61 (95% CI 0.57–0.64). Dense volume and percentage dense volume showed positive associations with breast cancer risk (HR 1.85 (95% CI 1.32–2.59) (p value for trend <0.001) and HR 2.17 (95% CI 1.51–3.12) (p value for trend <0.001), respectively, for Q4 compared to Q1). When adding texture measures to models with dense volume or percentage dense volume, c-indices increased from 0.56 (95% CI 0.53–0.59) to 0.62 (95% CI 0.58–0.65) (p < 0.001) and from 0.58 (95% CI 0.54–0.61) to 0.60 (95% CI 0.57–0.63) (p = 0.054), respectively. Conclusions Deep-learning-based texture pattern scores, measured automatically on digital mammograms, are associated with breast cancer risk, independently of volumetric mammographic density, and augment the capacity to discriminate between future breast cancer and non-breast cancer cases.

AB - Background Texture patterns have been shown to improve breast cancer risk segregation in addition to area-based mammographic density. The additional value of texture pattern scores on top of volumetric mammographic density measures in a large screening cohort has never been studied. Methods Volumetric mammographic density and texture pattern scores were assessed automatically for the first available digital mammography (DM) screening examination of 51,400 women (50–75 years of age) participating in the Dutch biennial breast cancer screening program between 2003 and 2011. The texture assessment method was developed in a previous study and validated in the current study. Breast cancer information was obtained from the screening registration system and through linkage with the Netherlands Cancer Registry. All screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed at the first available digital screening examination were excluded. During a median follow-up period of 4.2 (interquartile range (IQR) 2.0–6.2) years, 301 women were diagnosed with breast cancer. The associations between texture pattern scores, volumetric breast density measures and breast cancer risk were determined using Cox proportional hazard analyses. Discriminatory performance was assessed using c-indices. Results The median age of the women at the time of the first available digital mammography examination was 56 years (IQR 51–63). Texture pattern scores were positively associated with breast cancer risk (hazard ratio (HR) 3.16 (95% CI 2.16–4.62) (p value for trend <0.001), for quartile (Q) 4 compared to Q1). The c-index of texture was 0.61 (95% CI 0.57–0.64). Dense volume and percentage dense volume showed positive associations with breast cancer risk (HR 1.85 (95% CI 1.32–2.59) (p value for trend <0.001) and HR 2.17 (95% CI 1.51–3.12) (p value for trend <0.001), respectively, for Q4 compared to Q1). When adding texture measures to models with dense volume or percentage dense volume, c-indices increased from 0.56 (95% CI 0.53–0.59) to 0.62 (95% CI 0.58–0.65) (p < 0.001) and from 0.58 (95% CI 0.54–0.61) to 0.60 (95% CI 0.57–0.63) (p = 0.054), respectively. Conclusions Deep-learning-based texture pattern scores, measured automatically on digital mammograms, are associated with breast cancer risk, independently of volumetric mammographic density, and augment the capacity to discriminate between future breast cancer and non-breast cancer cases.

KW - Volumetric mammographic breast density

KW - Texture pattern scores

KW - Breast cancer risk

U2 - 10.1186/s13058-018-0961-7

DO - 10.1186/s13058-018-0961-7

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29720220

VL - 20

JO - Breast Cancer Research (Online Edition)

JF - Breast Cancer Research (Online Edition)

SN - 1465-5411

M1 - 36

ER -

ID: 203013003