A systematic analysis of regression models for protein engineering

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 2,49 MB, PDF-dokument

To optimize proteins for particular traits holds great promise for industrial and pharmaceutical purposes. Machine Learning is increasingly applied in this field to predict properties of proteins, thereby guiding the experimental optimization process. A natural question is: How much progress are we making with such predictions, and how important is the choice of regressor and representation? In this paper, we demonstrate that different assessment criteria for regressor performance can lead to dramatically different conclusions, depending on the choice of metric, and how one defines generalization. We highlight the fundamental issues of sample bias in typical regression scenarios and how this can lead to misleading conclusions about regressor performance. Finally, we make the case for the importance of calibrated uncertainty in this domain.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummere1012061
TidsskriftPLOS Computational Biology
Vol/bind20
Udgave nummer5 May
Antal sider22
ISSN1553-734X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2024

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
This work was in part supported by the Danish Data Science Academy (to RM ddsa.dk, DDSA-PhD-2022-010 which is funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation, NNF21SA0069429, novonordiskfonden.dk, and VILLUM FONDEN, 40516, veluxfoundations.dk). Further funding includes the NNF Center for 4D cellular dynamics (to NSH, NNF22OC0075851, novonordiskfonden. dk) and Villum Synergy (to NSH and WB, veluxfoundations.dk, DeepDesign 40578), the Innovation Fund Denmark (to WB and PMG, innovationsfonden.dk, 1044-00158A), the MLLS Center (Basic Machine Learning Research in Life Science, novonordiskfonden.dk, NNF20OC0062606), Digital Pilot Hub (to SB, Skylab Digital, Danish Ministry of Education and Science), and the Pioneer Centre for AI (to RM, PMG, SB, WB, Danish National Research Foundation, dg.dk, grant number P1). The funders played no role in study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Michael et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

ID: 392107551