TY - JOUR

T1 - Beta-shifts, their languages and computability

AU - Simonsen, Jakob Grue

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - For every real number ß >1, the ß-shift is a dynamical system describing iterations of the map x ¿ ßx mod 1 and is studied intensively in number theory. Each ß-shift has an associated language of finite strings of characters; properties of this language are studied for the additional insight they give into the dynamics of the underlying system. We prove that the language of the ß-shift is recursive iff ß is a computable real number. That fact yields a precise characterization of the reals: The real numbers ß for which we can compute arbitrarily good approximations—hence in particular the numbers for which we can compute their expansion to some base—are precisely those for which there exists a program that decides for any finite sequence of digits whether the sequence occurs as a subword of some element of the ß-shift. While the “only if” part of the proof of the above result is constructive, the “if” part is not. We show that no constructive proof of the “if” part exists. Hence, there exists no algorithm that transforms a program computing arbitrarily good approximations of a real number ß into a program deciding the language of the ß-shift.

AB - For every real number ß >1, the ß-shift is a dynamical system describing iterations of the map x ¿ ßx mod 1 and is studied intensively in number theory. Each ß-shift has an associated language of finite strings of characters; properties of this language are studied for the additional insight they give into the dynamics of the underlying system. We prove that the language of the ß-shift is recursive iff ß is a computable real number. That fact yields a precise characterization of the reals: The real numbers ß for which we can compute arbitrarily good approximations—hence in particular the numbers for which we can compute their expansion to some base—are precisely those for which there exists a program that decides for any finite sequence of digits whether the sequence occurs as a subword of some element of the ß-shift. While the “only if” part of the proof of the above result is constructive, the “if” part is not. We show that no constructive proof of the “if” part exists. Hence, there exists no algorithm that transforms a program computing arbitrarily good approximations of a real number ß into a program deciding the language of the ß-shift.

U2 - 10.1007/s00224-009-9245-z

DO - 10.1007/s00224-009-9245-z

M3 - Journal article

VL - 48

SP - 297

EP - 318

JO - Theory of Computing Systems

JF - Theory of Computing Systems

SN - 1432-4350

IS - 2

ER -