Identification of positions in literature using thematic network analysis: the case of early childhood inquiry-based science education

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Identification of positions in literature using thematic network analysis : the case of early childhood inquiry-based science education. / Mariegaard, Stine; Dupont Seidelin, Lars; Bruun, Jesper.

I: International Journal of Research and Method in Education, Bind 45, Nr. 5, 2022, s. 518–534.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Mariegaard, S, Dupont Seidelin, L & Bruun, J 2022, 'Identification of positions in literature using thematic network analysis: the case of early childhood inquiry-based science education', International Journal of Research and Method in Education, bind 45, nr. 5, s. 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2035351

APA

Mariegaard, S., Dupont Seidelin, L., & Bruun, J. (2022). Identification of positions in literature using thematic network analysis: the case of early childhood inquiry-based science education. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 45(5), 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2035351

Vancouver

Mariegaard S, Dupont Seidelin L, Bruun J. Identification of positions in literature using thematic network analysis: the case of early childhood inquiry-based science education. International Journal of Research and Method in Education. 2022;45(5):518–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2035351

Author

Mariegaard, Stine ; Dupont Seidelin, Lars ; Bruun, Jesper. / Identification of positions in literature using thematic network analysis : the case of early childhood inquiry-based science education. I: International Journal of Research and Method in Education. 2022 ; Bind 45, Nr. 5. s. 518–534.

Bibtex

@article{04c74f9317fe4ba18bdec4fbcc19214d,
title = "Identification of positions in literature using thematic network analysis: the case of early childhood inquiry-based science education",
abstract = "Reviews of literature often summarise research within a given field to provide succinct information about state of the art as well as gaps for future research to address. In educational research, such information includes different positions within a field; for example, theoretical positions underpinning empirical studies. Such theoretical positions may influence interpretations of research results and remain a challenge to map and present. Here, we show how to use thematic analysis and network analysis to construct maps, analyse, and synthesise theoretical positions within educational research. We use early childhood inquiry-based science education (ECIBSE) literature as a case because of its historical roots in Dewey{\textquoteright}s educational philosophy. This allows us to discuss findings in light of a well-known theoretical framework. Using our methodology, we analyse four theoretical positions for teaching and learning: (1) science should be learned through inquiry, (2) teaching should model scientific practices, (3) children should develop science-related competencies (4) child{\textquoteright}s experience should take precedence. After discussing these positions, we turn to methodological possibilities and challenges of using thematic network analysis for literature reviews. R-code, data, and instructions for reproducing our results are available at: https://github.com/jbruun/thematicDiscourseNetworkAnalysis",
keywords = "Faculty of Science, network analysis, IBSE, early childhood, review article",
author = "Stine Mariegaard and {Dupont Seidelin}, Lars and Jesper Bruun",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1080/1743727X.2022.2035351",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "518–534",
journal = "International Journal of Research and Method in Education",
issn = "1743-727X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identification of positions in literature using thematic network analysis

T2 - the case of early childhood inquiry-based science education

AU - Mariegaard, Stine

AU - Dupont Seidelin, Lars

AU - Bruun, Jesper

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Reviews of literature often summarise research within a given field to provide succinct information about state of the art as well as gaps for future research to address. In educational research, such information includes different positions within a field; for example, theoretical positions underpinning empirical studies. Such theoretical positions may influence interpretations of research results and remain a challenge to map and present. Here, we show how to use thematic analysis and network analysis to construct maps, analyse, and synthesise theoretical positions within educational research. We use early childhood inquiry-based science education (ECIBSE) literature as a case because of its historical roots in Dewey’s educational philosophy. This allows us to discuss findings in light of a well-known theoretical framework. Using our methodology, we analyse four theoretical positions for teaching and learning: (1) science should be learned through inquiry, (2) teaching should model scientific practices, (3) children should develop science-related competencies (4) child’s experience should take precedence. After discussing these positions, we turn to methodological possibilities and challenges of using thematic network analysis for literature reviews. R-code, data, and instructions for reproducing our results are available at: https://github.com/jbruun/thematicDiscourseNetworkAnalysis

AB - Reviews of literature often summarise research within a given field to provide succinct information about state of the art as well as gaps for future research to address. In educational research, such information includes different positions within a field; for example, theoretical positions underpinning empirical studies. Such theoretical positions may influence interpretations of research results and remain a challenge to map and present. Here, we show how to use thematic analysis and network analysis to construct maps, analyse, and synthesise theoretical positions within educational research. We use early childhood inquiry-based science education (ECIBSE) literature as a case because of its historical roots in Dewey’s educational philosophy. This allows us to discuss findings in light of a well-known theoretical framework. Using our methodology, we analyse four theoretical positions for teaching and learning: (1) science should be learned through inquiry, (2) teaching should model scientific practices, (3) children should develop science-related competencies (4) child’s experience should take precedence. After discussing these positions, we turn to methodological possibilities and challenges of using thematic network analysis for literature reviews. R-code, data, and instructions for reproducing our results are available at: https://github.com/jbruun/thematicDiscourseNetworkAnalysis

KW - Faculty of Science

KW - network analysis

KW - IBSE

KW - early childhood

KW - review article

U2 - 10.1080/1743727X.2022.2035351

DO - 10.1080/1743727X.2022.2035351

M3 - Journal article

VL - 45

SP - 518

EP - 534

JO - International Journal of Research and Method in Education

JF - International Journal of Research and Method in Education

SN - 1743-727X

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 286921614