Implicit bias and negative stereotyping in global software development and why it is time to move on!

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Implicit bias and negative stereotyping in global software development and why it is time to move on! / Matthiesen, Stina; Bjørn, Pernille; Trillingsgaard, Claus.

I: Journal of software: Evolution and Process, Bind 35, Nr. 5, e2435, 2023.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Matthiesen, S, Bjørn, P & Trillingsgaard, C 2023, 'Implicit bias and negative stereotyping in global software development and why it is time to move on!', Journal of software: Evolution and Process, bind 35, nr. 5, e2435. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2435

APA

Matthiesen, S., Bjørn, P., & Trillingsgaard, C. (2023). Implicit bias and negative stereotyping in global software development and why it is time to move on! Journal of software: Evolution and Process, 35(5), [e2435]. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2435

Vancouver

Matthiesen S, Bjørn P, Trillingsgaard C. Implicit bias and negative stereotyping in global software development and why it is time to move on! Journal of software: Evolution and Process. 2023;35(5). e2435. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2435

Author

Matthiesen, Stina ; Bjørn, Pernille ; Trillingsgaard, Claus. / Implicit bias and negative stereotyping in global software development and why it is time to move on!. I: Journal of software: Evolution and Process. 2023 ; Bind 35, Nr. 5.

Bibtex

@article{96bafe188872453dbf4fb2a35483a78d,
title = "Implicit bias and negative stereotyping in global software development and why it is time to move on!",
abstract = "Prior research documents how the use of national cultural differences when used as an argument for failed collaboration is problematic and makes information technology (IT) companies blind to the challenges in global software development (GSD). Nevertheless, we still witness how issues in GSD work are kept explained, applied, and predicted through generic descriptions of national cultural behavior. Based on two ethnographic studies conducted within two large Danish IT companies, we extend prior work on implicit bias. The paper presents empirical examples on the widespread practice of using racist and stereotypical rhetoric in GSD, which initially motivated us to look for alternative strategies for analyzing the actual and locally situated collaboration-related problems within organizations involved in GSD. Our contributions are threefold: (1) We show how the widespread practice of using negative stereotypical rhetoric is weaved into the fabric of GSD engagements; (2) we present the empirical results of attending to implicit bias as an approach to explore and combat pervasive practices that deploy static cultural narratives and stereotypes in GSD; and (3) we propose three areas in GSD that software organizations should investigate to identify and address the implicit biases that potentially challenge or shatter their distributed collaborative work.",
keywords = "distributed work, global software engineering (GSE), implicit bias, interventionist ethnography, national cultural differences, racism, unconscious bias",
author = "Stina Matthiesen and Pernille Bj{\o}rn and Claus Trillingsgaard",
note = "Special Issue: Best papers of the 14th International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP 2020) and 15th International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE 2020)",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1002/smr.2435",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
journal = "Journal of software: Evolution and Process",
issn = "2047-7481",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implicit bias and negative stereotyping in global software development and why it is time to move on!

AU - Matthiesen, Stina

AU - Bjørn, Pernille

AU - Trillingsgaard, Claus

N1 - Special Issue: Best papers of the 14th International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP 2020) and 15th International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE 2020)

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Prior research documents how the use of national cultural differences when used as an argument for failed collaboration is problematic and makes information technology (IT) companies blind to the challenges in global software development (GSD). Nevertheless, we still witness how issues in GSD work are kept explained, applied, and predicted through generic descriptions of national cultural behavior. Based on two ethnographic studies conducted within two large Danish IT companies, we extend prior work on implicit bias. The paper presents empirical examples on the widespread practice of using racist and stereotypical rhetoric in GSD, which initially motivated us to look for alternative strategies for analyzing the actual and locally situated collaboration-related problems within organizations involved in GSD. Our contributions are threefold: (1) We show how the widespread practice of using negative stereotypical rhetoric is weaved into the fabric of GSD engagements; (2) we present the empirical results of attending to implicit bias as an approach to explore and combat pervasive practices that deploy static cultural narratives and stereotypes in GSD; and (3) we propose three areas in GSD that software organizations should investigate to identify and address the implicit biases that potentially challenge or shatter their distributed collaborative work.

AB - Prior research documents how the use of national cultural differences when used as an argument for failed collaboration is problematic and makes information technology (IT) companies blind to the challenges in global software development (GSD). Nevertheless, we still witness how issues in GSD work are kept explained, applied, and predicted through generic descriptions of national cultural behavior. Based on two ethnographic studies conducted within two large Danish IT companies, we extend prior work on implicit bias. The paper presents empirical examples on the widespread practice of using racist and stereotypical rhetoric in GSD, which initially motivated us to look for alternative strategies for analyzing the actual and locally situated collaboration-related problems within organizations involved in GSD. Our contributions are threefold: (1) We show how the widespread practice of using negative stereotypical rhetoric is weaved into the fabric of GSD engagements; (2) we present the empirical results of attending to implicit bias as an approach to explore and combat pervasive practices that deploy static cultural narratives and stereotypes in GSD; and (3) we propose three areas in GSD that software organizations should investigate to identify and address the implicit biases that potentially challenge or shatter their distributed collaborative work.

KW - distributed work

KW - global software engineering (GSE)

KW - implicit bias

KW - interventionist ethnography

KW - national cultural differences

KW - racism

KW - unconscious bias

U2 - 10.1002/smr.2435

DO - 10.1002/smr.2435

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85124544448

VL - 35

JO - Journal of software: Evolution and Process

JF - Journal of software: Evolution and Process

SN - 2047-7481

IS - 5

M1 - e2435

ER -

ID: 299204735