‘Nutrimune®’ and immune defence against pathogens in the gastrointestinal and upper respiratory tracts: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006: (Scientific Opinion)

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelRådgivningfagfællebedømt

Standard

‘Nutrimune®’ and immune defence against pathogens in the gastrointestinal and upper respiratory tracts: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 : (Scientific Opinion). / EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA).

I: E F S A Journal, Bind 15, Nr. 1, 4679, 30.01.2017.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelRådgivningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) 2017, '‘Nutrimune®’ and immune defence against pathogens in the gastrointestinal and upper respiratory tracts: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006: (Scientific Opinion)', E F S A Journal, bind 15, nr. 1, 4679. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4679

APA

EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) (2017). ‘Nutrimune®’ and immune defence against pathogens in the gastrointestinal and upper respiratory tracts: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006: (Scientific Opinion). E F S A Journal, 15(1), [4679]. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4679

Vancouver

EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA). ‘Nutrimune®’ and immune defence against pathogens in the gastrointestinal and upper respiratory tracts: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006: (Scientific Opinion). E F S A Journal. 2017 jan. 30;15(1). 4679. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4679

Author

EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA). / ‘Nutrimune®’ and immune defence against pathogens in the gastrointestinal and upper respiratory tracts: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 : (Scientific Opinion). I: E F S A Journal. 2017 ; Bind 15, Nr. 1.

Bibtex

@article{6c3be4ba9511467489a673dad86799b7,
title = "{\textquoteleft}Nutrimune{\textregistered}{\textquoteright} and immune defence against pathogens in the gastrointestinal and upper respiratory tracts: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006: (Scientific Opinion)",
abstract = "Following an application from H.J. Heinz Supply Chain Europe B.V., submitted for authorisation of a health claim pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 via the Competent Authority of the Netherlands, the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) was asked to deliver an opinion on the scientific substantiation of a health claim related to {\textquoteleft}Nutrimune{\textregistered}{\textquoteright} and immune defence against pathogens in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and upper respiratory tract (URT). The food {\textquoteleft}Nutrimune{\textregistered}{\textquoteright} (a pasteurised cow{\textquoteright}s skim milk fermented with Lactobacillus paracasei CBA L74) which is the subject of the health claim is sufficiently characterised. The Panel considers that immunedefence against pathogens in GI tract and URT is a beneficial physiological effect. One human intervention study from which conclusions can be drawn showed an effect of {\textquoteleft}Nutrimune{\textregistered}{\textquoteright} on immune defence against pathogens in the GI tract and the URT, and the results from one animal study could support an effect of {\textquoteleft}Nutrimune{\textregistered}{\textquoteright} on defence against pathogens in the GI tract. However, there were inconsistencies in the reporting of the process and criteria used for the diagnosis of URTI in the human intervention study, the results of this study have not been replicated, and no evidence was provided for a plausible mechanism by which {\textquoteleft}Nutrimune{\textregistered}{\textquoteright} could exert the claimed effect in vivo in humans. The Panel concludes that the evidence provided is insufficient to establish a cause and effect relationship between the consumption of {\textquoteleft}Nutrimune{\textregistered}{\textquoteright} and immune defence against pathogens in the gastrointestinal and upper respiratory tracts.",
keywords = "Faculty of Science, Nutrimune{\textregistered}, Immune defence, Gastrointestinal tract, Upper respiratory tract, Infection, Children, Health claims",
author = "{EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)} and Sj{\"o}din, {Anders Mikael}",
note = "EFSA 2017 4679",
year = "2017",
month = jan,
day = "30",
doi = "10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4679",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
journal = "E F S A Journal",
issn = "1831-4732",
publisher = "European Food Safety Authority (E F S A)",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Nutrimune®’ and immune defence against pathogens in the gastrointestinal and upper respiratory tracts: evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006

T2 - (Scientific Opinion)

AU - EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)

AU - Sjödin, Anders Mikael

N1 - EFSA 2017 4679

PY - 2017/1/30

Y1 - 2017/1/30

N2 - Following an application from H.J. Heinz Supply Chain Europe B.V., submitted for authorisation of a health claim pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 via the Competent Authority of the Netherlands, the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) was asked to deliver an opinion on the scientific substantiation of a health claim related to ‘Nutrimune®’ and immune defence against pathogens in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and upper respiratory tract (URT). The food ‘Nutrimune®’ (a pasteurised cow’s skim milk fermented with Lactobacillus paracasei CBA L74) which is the subject of the health claim is sufficiently characterised. The Panel considers that immunedefence against pathogens in GI tract and URT is a beneficial physiological effect. One human intervention study from which conclusions can be drawn showed an effect of ‘Nutrimune®’ on immune defence against pathogens in the GI tract and the URT, and the results from one animal study could support an effect of ‘Nutrimune®’ on defence against pathogens in the GI tract. However, there were inconsistencies in the reporting of the process and criteria used for the diagnosis of URTI in the human intervention study, the results of this study have not been replicated, and no evidence was provided for a plausible mechanism by which ‘Nutrimune®’ could exert the claimed effect in vivo in humans. The Panel concludes that the evidence provided is insufficient to establish a cause and effect relationship between the consumption of ‘Nutrimune®’ and immune defence against pathogens in the gastrointestinal and upper respiratory tracts.

AB - Following an application from H.J. Heinz Supply Chain Europe B.V., submitted for authorisation of a health claim pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 via the Competent Authority of the Netherlands, the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) was asked to deliver an opinion on the scientific substantiation of a health claim related to ‘Nutrimune®’ and immune defence against pathogens in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and upper respiratory tract (URT). The food ‘Nutrimune®’ (a pasteurised cow’s skim milk fermented with Lactobacillus paracasei CBA L74) which is the subject of the health claim is sufficiently characterised. The Panel considers that immunedefence against pathogens in GI tract and URT is a beneficial physiological effect. One human intervention study from which conclusions can be drawn showed an effect of ‘Nutrimune®’ on immune defence against pathogens in the GI tract and the URT, and the results from one animal study could support an effect of ‘Nutrimune®’ on defence against pathogens in the GI tract. However, there were inconsistencies in the reporting of the process and criteria used for the diagnosis of URTI in the human intervention study, the results of this study have not been replicated, and no evidence was provided for a plausible mechanism by which ‘Nutrimune®’ could exert the claimed effect in vivo in humans. The Panel concludes that the evidence provided is insufficient to establish a cause and effect relationship between the consumption of ‘Nutrimune®’ and immune defence against pathogens in the gastrointestinal and upper respiratory tracts.

KW - Faculty of Science

KW - Nutrimune®

KW - Immune defence

KW - Gastrointestinal tract

KW - Upper respiratory tract

KW - Infection

KW - Children

KW - Health claims

U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4679

DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4679

M3 - Journal article

VL - 15

JO - E F S A Journal

JF - E F S A Journal

SN - 1831-4732

IS - 1

M1 - 4679

ER -

ID: 188399025