Determining the Credibility of Science Communication
Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Konferencebidrag i proceedings › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Dokumenter
- Determining the Credibility of Science Communication
Forlagets udgivne version, 164 KB, PDF-dokument
Most work on scholarly document processing assumes that the information processed is trust-worthy and factually correct. However, this is not always the case. There are two core challenges, which should be addressed: 1) ensuring that scientific publications are credible – e.g. that claims are not made without supporting evidence, and that all relevant supporting evidence is provided; and 2) that scientific findings are not misrepresented, distorted or outright misreported when communicated by journalists or the general public. I will present some first steps towards addressing these problems and outline remaining challenges.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Titel | Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing |
Antal sider | 6 |
Forlag | Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) |
Publikationsdato | 2021 |
Sider | 1-6 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - 2021 |
Begivenhed | 2nd Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing, - oNLINE Varighed: 10 jun. 2021 → 10 jun. 2021 |
Konference
Konference | 2nd Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing, |
---|---|
By | oNLINE |
Periode | 10/06/2021 → 10/06/2021 |
ID: 301732098