A probabilistic approach to emission-line galaxy classification

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

A probabilistic approach to emission-line galaxy classification. / de Souza, R. S.; Dantas, M. L.L.; Costa-Duarte, M. V.; Feigelson, E. D.; Killedar, M.; Lablanche, P. Y.; Vilalta, R.; Krone-Martins, A.; Beck, R.; Gieseke, F.

In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 472, No. 3, 01.12.2017, p. 2808-2822.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

de Souza, RS, Dantas, MLL, Costa-Duarte, MV, Feigelson, ED, Killedar, M, Lablanche, PY, Vilalta, R, Krone-Martins, A, Beck, R & Gieseke, F 2017, 'A probabilistic approach to emission-line galaxy classification', Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 472, no. 3, pp. 2808-2822. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2156

APA

de Souza, R. S., Dantas, M. L. L., Costa-Duarte, M. V., Feigelson, E. D., Killedar, M., Lablanche, P. Y., Vilalta, R., Krone-Martins, A., Beck, R., & Gieseke, F. (2017). A probabilistic approach to emission-line galaxy classification. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 472(3), 2808-2822. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2156

Vancouver

de Souza RS, Dantas MLL, Costa-Duarte MV, Feigelson ED, Killedar M, Lablanche PY et al. A probabilistic approach to emission-line galaxy classification. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2017 Dec 1;472(3):2808-2822. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2156

Author

de Souza, R. S. ; Dantas, M. L.L. ; Costa-Duarte, M. V. ; Feigelson, E. D. ; Killedar, M. ; Lablanche, P. Y. ; Vilalta, R. ; Krone-Martins, A. ; Beck, R. ; Gieseke, F. / A probabilistic approach to emission-line galaxy classification. In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2017 ; Vol. 472, No. 3. pp. 2808-2822.

Bibtex

@article{bf3bd9b657fb42458978f44a35c619e1,
title = "A probabilistic approach to emission-line galaxy classification",
abstract = "We invoke a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) to jointly analyse two traditional emission-line classification schemes of galaxy ionization sources: the Baldwin-Phillips-Terlevich (BPT) and WHa versus [N II]/H a (WHAN) diagrams, using spectroscopic data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 and SEAGal/STARLIGHT data sets. We apply a GMM to empirically define classes of galaxies in a three-dimensional space spanned by the log [O III]/Hβ, log [NII]/Hα and log EW(H α) optical parameters. The best-fitting GMM based on several statistical criteria suggests a solution around four Gaussian components (GCs), which are capable to explain up to 97 per cent of the data variance. Using elements of information theory, we compare each GC to their respective astronomical counterpart. GC1 and GC4 are associated with star-forming galaxies, suggesting the need to define a new starburst subgroup. GC2 is associated with BPT's active galactic nuclei (AGN) class and WHAN's weak AGN class. GC3 is associated with BPT's composite class and WHAN's strong AGN class. Conversely, there is no statistical evidence - based on four GCs - for the existence of a Seyfert/lowionization nuclear emission-line region (LINER) dichotomy in our sample. Notwithstanding, the inclusion of an additional GC5 unravels it. The GC5 appears associated with the LINER and passive galaxies on the BPT and WHAN diagrams, respectively. This indicates that if the Seyfert/LINER dichotomy is there, it does not account significantly to the global data variance and may be overlooked by standard metrics of goodness of fit. Subtleties aside, we demonstrate the potential of our methodology to recover/unravel different objects inside the wilderness of astronomical data sets, without lacking the ability to convey physically interpretable results. The probabilistic classifications from the GMM analysis are publicly available within the COINtoolbox at https://cointoolbox.github.io/GMM_Catalogue/.",
keywords = "Galaxies: evolution, Galaxies: general, Galaxies: nuclei, Galaxies: star formation, methods: data analysis",
author = "{de Souza}, {R. S.} and Dantas, {M. L.L.} and Costa-Duarte, {M. V.} and Feigelson, {E. D.} and M. Killedar and Lablanche, {P. Y.} and R. Vilalta and A. Krone-Martins and R. Beck and F. Gieseke",
year = "2017",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/mnras/stx2156",
language = "English",
volume = "472",
pages = "2808--2822",
journal = "Royal Astronomical Society. Monthly Notices",
issn = "0035-8711",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A probabilistic approach to emission-line galaxy classification

AU - de Souza, R. S.

AU - Dantas, M. L.L.

AU - Costa-Duarte, M. V.

AU - Feigelson, E. D.

AU - Killedar, M.

AU - Lablanche, P. Y.

AU - Vilalta, R.

AU - Krone-Martins, A.

AU - Beck, R.

AU - Gieseke, F.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - We invoke a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) to jointly analyse two traditional emission-line classification schemes of galaxy ionization sources: the Baldwin-Phillips-Terlevich (BPT) and WHa versus [N II]/H a (WHAN) diagrams, using spectroscopic data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 and SEAGal/STARLIGHT data sets. We apply a GMM to empirically define classes of galaxies in a three-dimensional space spanned by the log [O III]/Hβ, log [NII]/Hα and log EW(H α) optical parameters. The best-fitting GMM based on several statistical criteria suggests a solution around four Gaussian components (GCs), which are capable to explain up to 97 per cent of the data variance. Using elements of information theory, we compare each GC to their respective astronomical counterpart. GC1 and GC4 are associated with star-forming galaxies, suggesting the need to define a new starburst subgroup. GC2 is associated with BPT's active galactic nuclei (AGN) class and WHAN's weak AGN class. GC3 is associated with BPT's composite class and WHAN's strong AGN class. Conversely, there is no statistical evidence - based on four GCs - for the existence of a Seyfert/lowionization nuclear emission-line region (LINER) dichotomy in our sample. Notwithstanding, the inclusion of an additional GC5 unravels it. The GC5 appears associated with the LINER and passive galaxies on the BPT and WHAN diagrams, respectively. This indicates that if the Seyfert/LINER dichotomy is there, it does not account significantly to the global data variance and may be overlooked by standard metrics of goodness of fit. Subtleties aside, we demonstrate the potential of our methodology to recover/unravel different objects inside the wilderness of astronomical data sets, without lacking the ability to convey physically interpretable results. The probabilistic classifications from the GMM analysis are publicly available within the COINtoolbox at https://cointoolbox.github.io/GMM_Catalogue/.

AB - We invoke a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) to jointly analyse two traditional emission-line classification schemes of galaxy ionization sources: the Baldwin-Phillips-Terlevich (BPT) and WHa versus [N II]/H a (WHAN) diagrams, using spectroscopic data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 and SEAGal/STARLIGHT data sets. We apply a GMM to empirically define classes of galaxies in a three-dimensional space spanned by the log [O III]/Hβ, log [NII]/Hα and log EW(H α) optical parameters. The best-fitting GMM based on several statistical criteria suggests a solution around four Gaussian components (GCs), which are capable to explain up to 97 per cent of the data variance. Using elements of information theory, we compare each GC to their respective astronomical counterpart. GC1 and GC4 are associated with star-forming galaxies, suggesting the need to define a new starburst subgroup. GC2 is associated with BPT's active galactic nuclei (AGN) class and WHAN's weak AGN class. GC3 is associated with BPT's composite class and WHAN's strong AGN class. Conversely, there is no statistical evidence - based on four GCs - for the existence of a Seyfert/lowionization nuclear emission-line region (LINER) dichotomy in our sample. Notwithstanding, the inclusion of an additional GC5 unravels it. The GC5 appears associated with the LINER and passive galaxies on the BPT and WHAN diagrams, respectively. This indicates that if the Seyfert/LINER dichotomy is there, it does not account significantly to the global data variance and may be overlooked by standard metrics of goodness of fit. Subtleties aside, we demonstrate the potential of our methodology to recover/unravel different objects inside the wilderness of astronomical data sets, without lacking the ability to convey physically interpretable results. The probabilistic classifications from the GMM analysis are publicly available within the COINtoolbox at https://cointoolbox.github.io/GMM_Catalogue/.

KW - Galaxies: evolution

KW - Galaxies: general

KW - Galaxies: nuclei

KW - Galaxies: star formation

KW - methods: data analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030836515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/mnras/stx2156

DO - 10.1093/mnras/stx2156

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85030836515

VL - 472

SP - 2808

EP - 2822

JO - Royal Astronomical Society. Monthly Notices

JF - Royal Astronomical Society. Monthly Notices

SN - 0035-8711

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 195161687