Building Community Knowledge Systems: An Empirical Study of IT-Support for Sharing Best Practices among Managers

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Building Community Knowledge Systems : An Empirical Study of IT-Support for Sharing Best Practices among Managers. / Bansler, Jørgen P.; Havn, Erling C.

In: Knowledge and Process Management (Online), Vol. 10, No. 3, 2003, p. 156-163.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Bansler, JP & Havn, EC 2003, 'Building Community Knowledge Systems: An Empirical Study of IT-Support for Sharing Best Practices among Managers', Knowledge and Process Management (Online), vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 156-163.

APA

Bansler, J. P., & Havn, E. C. (2003). Building Community Knowledge Systems: An Empirical Study of IT-Support for Sharing Best Practices among Managers. Knowledge and Process Management (Online), 10(3), 156-163.

Vancouver

Bansler JP, Havn EC. Building Community Knowledge Systems: An Empirical Study of IT-Support for Sharing Best Practices among Managers. Knowledge and Process Management (Online). 2003;10(3):156-163.

Author

Bansler, Jørgen P. ; Havn, Erling C. / Building Community Knowledge Systems : An Empirical Study of IT-Support for Sharing Best Practices among Managers. In: Knowledge and Process Management (Online). 2003 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 156-163.

Bibtex

@article{02674ce6abb548c5a4b599b2260a2f64,
title = "Building Community Knowledge Systems: An Empirical Study of IT-Support for Sharing Best Practices among Managers",
abstract = "The paper reports a field study of knowledge sharing in a large and complex organization. The objective of the study was to gain an in-depth understanding of the implementation and use of a web-based knowledge sharing system designed to facilitate the circulation of best practices among middle managers. We followed the system from its introduction in early 1997 until it was abandoned in the beginning of 2000. We focused on the way the system was introduced in the organization, how it changed, and how the intended group of users received (and eventually rejected) the system. Based on our interviews and observations we identify five reasons for the systems failure. We close the paper by some reflections on the use of the concept of “shared practice” in the development of IT-supported knowledge sharing systems.",
author = "Bansler, {J{\o}rgen P.} and Havn, {Erling C.}",
year = "2003",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "156--163",
journal = "Knowledge and Process Management",
issn = "1092-4604",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Building Community Knowledge Systems

T2 - An Empirical Study of IT-Support for Sharing Best Practices among Managers

AU - Bansler, Jørgen P.

AU - Havn, Erling C.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - The paper reports a field study of knowledge sharing in a large and complex organization. The objective of the study was to gain an in-depth understanding of the implementation and use of a web-based knowledge sharing system designed to facilitate the circulation of best practices among middle managers. We followed the system from its introduction in early 1997 until it was abandoned in the beginning of 2000. We focused on the way the system was introduced in the organization, how it changed, and how the intended group of users received (and eventually rejected) the system. Based on our interviews and observations we identify five reasons for the systems failure. We close the paper by some reflections on the use of the concept of “shared practice” in the development of IT-supported knowledge sharing systems.

AB - The paper reports a field study of knowledge sharing in a large and complex organization. The objective of the study was to gain an in-depth understanding of the implementation and use of a web-based knowledge sharing system designed to facilitate the circulation of best practices among middle managers. We followed the system from its introduction in early 1997 until it was abandoned in the beginning of 2000. We focused on the way the system was introduced in the organization, how it changed, and how the intended group of users received (and eventually rejected) the system. Based on our interviews and observations we identify five reasons for the systems failure. We close the paper by some reflections on the use of the concept of “shared practice” in the development of IT-supported knowledge sharing systems.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 10

SP - 156

EP - 163

JO - Knowledge and Process Management

JF - Knowledge and Process Management

SN - 1092-4604

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 81388464