Morphology on Categorical Distributions

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Morphology on Categorical Distributions. / Ørting, Silas Nyboe; Stephensen, Hans Jacob Teglbjærg; Sporring, Jon.

In: Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, Vol. 65, 2023, p. 861–873.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Ørting, SN, Stephensen, HJT & Sporring, J 2023, 'Morphology on Categorical Distributions', Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, vol. 65, pp. 861–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10851-023-01146-x

APA

Ørting, S. N., Stephensen, H. J. T., & Sporring, J. (2023). Morphology on Categorical Distributions. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 65, 861–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10851-023-01146-x

Vancouver

Ørting SN, Stephensen HJT, Sporring J. Morphology on Categorical Distributions. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision. 2023;65:861–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10851-023-01146-x

Author

Ørting, Silas Nyboe ; Stephensen, Hans Jacob Teglbjærg ; Sporring, Jon. / Morphology on Categorical Distributions. In: Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision. 2023 ; Vol. 65. pp. 861–873.

Bibtex

@article{fb056fe7d0094668869cc08a4b565aa8,
title = "Morphology on Categorical Distributions",
abstract = "Mathematical morphology (MM) is an indispensable tool for post-processing. Several extensions of MM to categorical images, such as multi-class segmentations, have been proposed. However, none provide satisfactory definitions for morphology on probabilistic representations of categorical images. The categorical distribution is a natural choice for representing uncertainty about categorical images. Extending MM to categorical distributions is problematic because categories are inherently unordered. Without ranking categories, we cannot use the standard framework based on supremum and infimum. Ranking categories is impractical and problematic. Instead, we consider the probabilistic representation and operations that emphasize a single category. In this work, we review and compare previous approaches. We propose two approaches for morphology on categorical distributions: operating on Dirichlet distributions over the parameters of the distributions and operating directly on the distributions. We propose a “protected” variant of the latter and demonstrate the proposed approaches by fixing misclassifications and modeling annotator bias.",
author = "{\O}rting, {Silas Nyboe} and Stephensen, {Hans Jacob Teglbj{\ae}rg} and Jon Sporring",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1007/s10851-023-01146-x",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "861–873",
journal = "Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision",
issn = "0924-9907",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Morphology on Categorical Distributions

AU - Ørting, Silas Nyboe

AU - Stephensen, Hans Jacob Teglbjærg

AU - Sporring, Jon

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Mathematical morphology (MM) is an indispensable tool for post-processing. Several extensions of MM to categorical images, such as multi-class segmentations, have been proposed. However, none provide satisfactory definitions for morphology on probabilistic representations of categorical images. The categorical distribution is a natural choice for representing uncertainty about categorical images. Extending MM to categorical distributions is problematic because categories are inherently unordered. Without ranking categories, we cannot use the standard framework based on supremum and infimum. Ranking categories is impractical and problematic. Instead, we consider the probabilistic representation and operations that emphasize a single category. In this work, we review and compare previous approaches. We propose two approaches for morphology on categorical distributions: operating on Dirichlet distributions over the parameters of the distributions and operating directly on the distributions. We propose a “protected” variant of the latter and demonstrate the proposed approaches by fixing misclassifications and modeling annotator bias.

AB - Mathematical morphology (MM) is an indispensable tool for post-processing. Several extensions of MM to categorical images, such as multi-class segmentations, have been proposed. However, none provide satisfactory definitions for morphology on probabilistic representations of categorical images. The categorical distribution is a natural choice for representing uncertainty about categorical images. Extending MM to categorical distributions is problematic because categories are inherently unordered. Without ranking categories, we cannot use the standard framework based on supremum and infimum. Ranking categories is impractical and problematic. Instead, we consider the probabilistic representation and operations that emphasize a single category. In this work, we review and compare previous approaches. We propose two approaches for morphology on categorical distributions: operating on Dirichlet distributions over the parameters of the distributions and operating directly on the distributions. We propose a “protected” variant of the latter and demonstrate the proposed approaches by fixing misclassifications and modeling annotator bias.

UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10851-023-01146-x

U2 - 10.1007/s10851-023-01146-x

DO - 10.1007/s10851-023-01146-x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 65

SP - 861

EP - 873

JO - Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision

JF - Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision

SN - 0924-9907

ER -

ID: 346407446