Does distance still matter? Revisiting the CSCW fundamentals on distributed collaboration

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Does distance still matter? Revisiting the CSCW fundamentals on distributed collaboration. / Bjørn, Pernille; Esbensen, Morten; Jensen, Rasmus Eskild; Matthiesen, Stina.

In: ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 21, No. 5, 27, 01.11.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Bjørn, P, Esbensen, M, Jensen, RE & Matthiesen, S 2014, 'Does distance still matter? Revisiting the CSCW fundamentals on distributed collaboration', ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 21, no. 5, 27. https://doi.org/10.1145/2670534

APA

Bjørn, P., Esbensen, M., Jensen, R. E., & Matthiesen, S. (2014). Does distance still matter? Revisiting the CSCW fundamentals on distributed collaboration. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 21(5), [27]. https://doi.org/10.1145/2670534

Vancouver

Bjørn P, Esbensen M, Jensen RE, Matthiesen S. Does distance still matter? Revisiting the CSCW fundamentals on distributed collaboration. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 2014 Nov 1;21(5). 27. https://doi.org/10.1145/2670534

Author

Bjørn, Pernille ; Esbensen, Morten ; Jensen, Rasmus Eskild ; Matthiesen, Stina. / Does distance still matter? Revisiting the CSCW fundamentals on distributed collaboration. In: ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 5.

Bibtex

@article{309baa4fc838446184b076dfd5b43dc5,
title = "Does distance still matter? Revisiting the CSCW fundamentals on distributed collaboration",
abstract = "Does distance still matter? Reporting on a comparative analysis of four ethnographic studies of global software development, this article analyzes the fundamental aspects of distance as depicted in the famous paper {"}Distance Matters.{"} The results suggest that, although while common ground, collaboration readiness, and organizational management are still important aspects for distributed collaboration, the arguments concerning coupling of work and collaboration technology readiness need to be refined. We argue that in working remotely, closely coupled work tasks encourage remote workers to spend the extra effort required in articulation of work to make the collaboration function. Also we find that people in distributed software development have already made collaborative technologies part of their work, and individuals are comfortable with them; thus, collaboration technology readiness takes a different shape in this setting.",
keywords = "Closely coupled work, Collaboration readiness, Collaboration technology readiness, Common ground, Coupling of work",
author = "Pernille Bj{\o}rn and Morten Esbensen and Jensen, {Rasmus Eskild} and Stina Matthiesen",
year = "2014",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1145/2670534",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
journal = "ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction",
issn = "1073-0516",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery, Inc.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does distance still matter? Revisiting the CSCW fundamentals on distributed collaboration

AU - Bjørn, Pernille

AU - Esbensen, Morten

AU - Jensen, Rasmus Eskild

AU - Matthiesen, Stina

PY - 2014/11/1

Y1 - 2014/11/1

N2 - Does distance still matter? Reporting on a comparative analysis of four ethnographic studies of global software development, this article analyzes the fundamental aspects of distance as depicted in the famous paper "Distance Matters." The results suggest that, although while common ground, collaboration readiness, and organizational management are still important aspects for distributed collaboration, the arguments concerning coupling of work and collaboration technology readiness need to be refined. We argue that in working remotely, closely coupled work tasks encourage remote workers to spend the extra effort required in articulation of work to make the collaboration function. Also we find that people in distributed software development have already made collaborative technologies part of their work, and individuals are comfortable with them; thus, collaboration technology readiness takes a different shape in this setting.

AB - Does distance still matter? Reporting on a comparative analysis of four ethnographic studies of global software development, this article analyzes the fundamental aspects of distance as depicted in the famous paper "Distance Matters." The results suggest that, although while common ground, collaboration readiness, and organizational management are still important aspects for distributed collaboration, the arguments concerning coupling of work and collaboration technology readiness need to be refined. We argue that in working remotely, closely coupled work tasks encourage remote workers to spend the extra effort required in articulation of work to make the collaboration function. Also we find that people in distributed software development have already made collaborative technologies part of their work, and individuals are comfortable with them; thus, collaboration technology readiness takes a different shape in this setting.

KW - Closely coupled work

KW - Collaboration readiness

KW - Collaboration technology readiness

KW - Common ground

KW - Coupling of work

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84914158540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/2670534

DO - 10.1145/2670534

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84914158540

VL - 21

JO - ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

JF - ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

SN - 1073-0516

IS - 5

M1 - 27

ER -

ID: 225660465