Determining the Credibility of Science Communication

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

Standard

Determining the Credibility of Science Communication. / Augenstein, Isabelle.

Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2021. p. 1-6.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Augenstein, I 2021, Determining the Credibility of Science Communication. in Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 1-6, 2nd Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing, oNLINE, 10/06/2021. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.sdp-1.1

APA

Augenstein, I. (2021). Determining the Credibility of Science Communication. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing (pp. 1-6). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.sdp-1.1

Vancouver

Augenstein I. Determining the Credibility of Science Communication. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). 2021. p. 1-6 https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.sdp-1.1

Author

Augenstein, Isabelle. / Determining the Credibility of Science Communication. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2021. pp. 1-6

Bibtex

@inproceedings{a8120bdb70ec4fad947cbc05bd737cfb,
title = "Determining the Credibility of Science Communication",
abstract = "Most work on scholarly document processing assumes that the information processed is trust-worthy and factually correct. However, this is not always the case. There are two core challenges, which should be addressed: 1) ensuring that scientific publications are credible – e.g. that claims are not made without supporting evidence, and that all relevant supporting evidence is provided; and 2) that scientific findings are not misrepresented, distorted or outright misreported when communicated by journalists or the general public. I will present some first steps towards addressing these problems and outline remaining challenges.",
author = "Isabelle Augenstein",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2021.sdp-1.1",
language = "English",
pages = "1--6",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)",
address = "United States",
note = "2nd Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing, ; Conference date: 10-06-2021 Through 10-06-2021",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Determining the Credibility of Science Communication

AU - Augenstein, Isabelle

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Most work on scholarly document processing assumes that the information processed is trust-worthy and factually correct. However, this is not always the case. There are two core challenges, which should be addressed: 1) ensuring that scientific publications are credible – e.g. that claims are not made without supporting evidence, and that all relevant supporting evidence is provided; and 2) that scientific findings are not misrepresented, distorted or outright misreported when communicated by journalists or the general public. I will present some first steps towards addressing these problems and outline remaining challenges.

AB - Most work on scholarly document processing assumes that the information processed is trust-worthy and factually correct. However, this is not always the case. There are two core challenges, which should be addressed: 1) ensuring that scientific publications are credible – e.g. that claims are not made without supporting evidence, and that all relevant supporting evidence is provided; and 2) that scientific findings are not misrepresented, distorted or outright misreported when communicated by journalists or the general public. I will present some first steps towards addressing these problems and outline remaining challenges.

U2 - 10.18653/v1/2021.sdp-1.1

DO - 10.18653/v1/2021.sdp-1.1

M3 - Article in proceedings

SP - 1

EP - 6

BT - Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing

PB - Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)

T2 - 2nd Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing,

Y2 - 10 June 2021 through 10 June 2021

ER -

ID: 301732098