The Transitional Justice and Foreign Policy Nexus: The Inefficient Causation of State Ontological Security-Seeking
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
How does an approach towards transitional justice produce preconditions for a country's international action, enabling certain policies and practices in the immediate neighborhood and international society at large? This article unpacks ontological security-seeking as a generic social mechanism in international politics, which makes it possible to productively conceptualize the connection between a state's transitional justice and foreign policies. Going beyond the dichotomy of transitional justice compliance and noncompliance by gauging the role of states’ subjective sense of self in driving their behavior, I develop an analytical framework to explain how state ontological security-seeking relates to major transitions and consequent state identity disjuncture, the ensuing politics of truth-and-justice-seeking, and its international resonance in framing and executing particular foreign policies. I offer a typology of the international consequences of states’ transitional justice politics, distinguishing between reflective and mnemonical security-oriented approaches, spawning cooperative and conflictual foreign policy behavior, respectively. The empirical purchase of the purported nexus is illustrated with the example of post-Soviet Russia's limited politics of accountability toward the repressions of its antecedent regime and its increasingly self-assertive and confrontational stance in contemporary international politics.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | International Studies Review |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 3 |
Pages (from-to) | 373-397 |
Number of pages | 24 |
ISSN | 1521-9488 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2 Apr 2018 |
- Faculty of Social Sciences - foreign policy, inefficient causation, ontological security, Russia, transitional justice
Research areas
ID: 284504946