Abstraction, mimesis and the evolution of deep learning
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Abstraction, mimesis and the evolution of deep learning. / Eklöf, Jon; Hamelryck, Thomas; Last, Cadell; Grima, Alexander; Snis, Ulrika Lundh.
In: AI and Society, 2024.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Abstraction, mimesis and the evolution of deep learning
AU - Eklöf, Jon
AU - Hamelryck, Thomas
AU - Last, Cadell
AU - Grima, Alexander
AU - Snis, Ulrika Lundh
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Deep learning developers typically rely on deep learning software frameworks (DLSFs)—simply described as pre-packaged libraries of programming components that provide high-level access to deep learning functionality. New DLSFs progressively encapsulate mathematical, statistical and computational complexity. Such higher levels of abstraction subsequently make it easier for deep learning methodology to spread through mimesis (i.e., imitation of models perceived as successful). In this study, we quantify this increase in abstraction and discuss its implications. Analyzing publicly available code from Github, we found that the introduction of DLSFs correlates both with significant increases in the number of deep learning projects and substantial reductions in the number of lines of code used. We subsequently discuss and argue the importance of abstraction in deep learning with respect to ephemeralization, technological advancement, democratization, adopting timely levels of abstraction, the emergence of mimetic deadlocks, issues related to the use of black box methods including privacy and fairness, and the concentration of technological power. Finally, we also discuss abstraction as a symptom of an ongoing technological metatransition.
AB - Deep learning developers typically rely on deep learning software frameworks (DLSFs)—simply described as pre-packaged libraries of programming components that provide high-level access to deep learning functionality. New DLSFs progressively encapsulate mathematical, statistical and computational complexity. Such higher levels of abstraction subsequently make it easier for deep learning methodology to spread through mimesis (i.e., imitation of models perceived as successful). In this study, we quantify this increase in abstraction and discuss its implications. Analyzing publicly available code from Github, we found that the introduction of DLSFs correlates both with significant increases in the number of deep learning projects and substantial reductions in the number of lines of code used. We subsequently discuss and argue the importance of abstraction in deep learning with respect to ephemeralization, technological advancement, democratization, adopting timely levels of abstraction, the emergence of mimetic deadlocks, issues related to the use of black box methods including privacy and fairness, and the concentration of technological power. Finally, we also discuss abstraction as a symptom of an ongoing technological metatransition.
KW - Abstraction
KW - Deep learning
KW - Evolution of deep learning
KW - Mimesis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160720644&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00146-023-01688-z
DO - 10.1007/s00146-023-01688-z
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85160720644
JO - AI and Society
JF - AI and Society
SN - 0951-5666
ER -
ID: 356884219