Branching execution symmetry in Jeopardy by available implicit arguments analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Branching execution symmetry in Jeopardy by available implicit arguments analysis. / Tilsted Kristensen, Joachim; Kaarsgaard, Robin; Thomsen, Michael Kirkedal.

In: NIKT: Norsk IKT-konferanse for forskning og utdanning, Vol. 2022, No. 1, 2023, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Tilsted Kristensen, J, Kaarsgaard, R & Thomsen, MK 2023, 'Branching execution symmetry in Jeopardy by available implicit arguments analysis', NIKT: Norsk IKT-konferanse for forskning og utdanning, vol. 2022, no. 1, pp. 1-14. <https://ojs.bibsys.no/index.php/NIK/article/view/1043>

APA

Tilsted Kristensen, J., Kaarsgaard, R., & Thomsen, M. K. (2023). Branching execution symmetry in Jeopardy by available implicit arguments analysis. NIKT: Norsk IKT-konferanse for forskning og utdanning, 2022(1), 1-14. https://ojs.bibsys.no/index.php/NIK/article/view/1043

Vancouver

Tilsted Kristensen J, Kaarsgaard R, Thomsen MK. Branching execution symmetry in Jeopardy by available implicit arguments analysis. NIKT: Norsk IKT-konferanse for forskning og utdanning. 2023;2022(1):1-14.

Author

Tilsted Kristensen, Joachim ; Kaarsgaard, Robin ; Thomsen, Michael Kirkedal. / Branching execution symmetry in Jeopardy by available implicit arguments analysis. In: NIKT: Norsk IKT-konferanse for forskning og utdanning. 2023 ; Vol. 2022, No. 1. pp. 1-14.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{000fd3db2c2c4dd0b53ce791b506c895,
title = "Branching execution symmetry in Jeopardy by available implicit arguments analysis",
abstract = "When the inverse of an algorithm is well-defined – that is, when its output can be deterministically transformed into the input pro- ducing it – we say that the algorithm is invertible. While one can describe an invertible algorithm using a general-purpose programming language, it is generally not possible to guarantee that its inverse is well-defined without additional argument. Reversible languages enforce determinis- tic inverse interpretation at the cost of expressibility, by restricting the building blocks from which an algorithm may be constructed. Jeopardy is a functional programming language designed for writing in- vertible algorithms without the syntactic restrictions of reversible pro- gramming. In particular, Jeopardy allows the limited use of locally non- invertible operations, provided that they are used in a way that can be statically determined to be globally invertible. However, guaranteeing invertibility in Jeopardy is not obvious. One of the central problems in guaranteeing invertibility is that of de- ciding whether a program is symmetric in the face of branching control flow. In this paper, we show how Jeopardy can solve this problem, us- ing a program analysis called available implicit arguments analysis, to approximate branching symmetries.",
author = "{Tilsted Kristensen}, Joachim and Robin Kaarsgaard and Thomsen, {Michael Kirkedal}",
year = "2023",
language = "English",
volume = "2022",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "NIKT: Norsk IKT-konferanse for forskning og utdanning",
issn = "1892-0713",
number = "1",
note = "Norwegian ICT Conference for Research and Education ; Conference date: 27-11-2022 Through 30-11-2022",
url = "https://www.uia.no/konferanser-og-seminarer/nikt-2022",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Branching execution symmetry in Jeopardy by available implicit arguments analysis

AU - Tilsted Kristensen, Joachim

AU - Kaarsgaard, Robin

AU - Thomsen, Michael Kirkedal

N1 - Conference code: 35

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - When the inverse of an algorithm is well-defined – that is, when its output can be deterministically transformed into the input pro- ducing it – we say that the algorithm is invertible. While one can describe an invertible algorithm using a general-purpose programming language, it is generally not possible to guarantee that its inverse is well-defined without additional argument. Reversible languages enforce determinis- tic inverse interpretation at the cost of expressibility, by restricting the building blocks from which an algorithm may be constructed. Jeopardy is a functional programming language designed for writing in- vertible algorithms without the syntactic restrictions of reversible pro- gramming. In particular, Jeopardy allows the limited use of locally non- invertible operations, provided that they are used in a way that can be statically determined to be globally invertible. However, guaranteeing invertibility in Jeopardy is not obvious. One of the central problems in guaranteeing invertibility is that of de- ciding whether a program is symmetric in the face of branching control flow. In this paper, we show how Jeopardy can solve this problem, us- ing a program analysis called available implicit arguments analysis, to approximate branching symmetries.

AB - When the inverse of an algorithm is well-defined – that is, when its output can be deterministically transformed into the input pro- ducing it – we say that the algorithm is invertible. While one can describe an invertible algorithm using a general-purpose programming language, it is generally not possible to guarantee that its inverse is well-defined without additional argument. Reversible languages enforce determinis- tic inverse interpretation at the cost of expressibility, by restricting the building blocks from which an algorithm may be constructed. Jeopardy is a functional programming language designed for writing in- vertible algorithms without the syntactic restrictions of reversible pro- gramming. In particular, Jeopardy allows the limited use of locally non- invertible operations, provided that they are used in a way that can be statically determined to be globally invertible. However, guaranteeing invertibility in Jeopardy is not obvious. One of the central problems in guaranteeing invertibility is that of de- ciding whether a program is symmetric in the face of branching control flow. In this paper, we show how Jeopardy can solve this problem, us- ing a program analysis called available implicit arguments analysis, to approximate branching symmetries.

M3 - Conference article

VL - 2022

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - NIKT: Norsk IKT-konferanse for forskning og utdanning

JF - NIKT: Norsk IKT-konferanse for forskning og utdanning

SN - 1892-0713

IS - 1

T2 - Norwegian ICT Conference for Research and Education

Y2 - 27 November 2022 through 30 November 2022

ER -

ID: 375718252