Discounted Repeated Games Having Computable Strategies with No Computable Best Response under Subgame-Perfect Equilibria

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Discounted Repeated Games Having Computable Strategies with No Computable Best Response under Subgame-Perfect Equilibria. / Dargaj, Jakub; Simonsen, Jakob Grue.

In: ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, Vol. 10, No. 1, 3, 2022, p. 1-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Dargaj, J & Simonsen, JG 2022, 'Discounted Repeated Games Having Computable Strategies with No Computable Best Response under Subgame-Perfect Equilibria', ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, vol. 10, no. 1, 3, pp. 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3505585

APA

Dargaj, J., & Simonsen, J. G. (2022). Discounted Repeated Games Having Computable Strategies with No Computable Best Response under Subgame-Perfect Equilibria. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, 10(1), 1-39. [3]. https://doi.org/10.1145/3505585

Vancouver

Dargaj J, Simonsen JG. Discounted Repeated Games Having Computable Strategies with No Computable Best Response under Subgame-Perfect Equilibria. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation. 2022;10(1):1-39. 3. https://doi.org/10.1145/3505585

Author

Dargaj, Jakub ; Simonsen, Jakob Grue. / Discounted Repeated Games Having Computable Strategies with No Computable Best Response under Subgame-Perfect Equilibria. In: ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation. 2022 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 1-39.

Bibtex

@article{1aea9f43a6544513aacbd786e9fc884b,
title = "Discounted Repeated Games Having Computable Strategies with No Computable Best Response under Subgame-Perfect Equilibria",
abstract = "A classic result in computational game theory states that there are infinitely repeated games where one player has a computable strategy that has a best response, but no computable best response. For games with discounted payoff, the result is known to hold for a specific class of games-essentially generalizations of Prisoner's Dilemma-but until now, no necessary and sufficient condition is known. To be of any value, the computable strategy having no computable best response must be part of a subgame-perfect equilibrium, as otherwise a rational, self-interested player would not play the strategy.We give the first necessary and sufficient conditions for a two-player repeated game to have such a computable strategy with no computable best response for all discount factors above some threshold. The conditions involve existence of a Nash equilibrium of the repeated game whose discounted payoffs satisfy certain conditions involving the min-max payoffs of the underlying stage game. We show that it is decidable in polynomial time in the size of the payoff matrix of whether it satisfies these conditions. ",
keywords = "best response strategies, discounted payoff, Nash equilibria, Repeated games, subgame-perfect equilibria",
author = "Jakub Dargaj and Simonsen, {Jakob Grue}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Association for Computing Machinery.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1145/3505585",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1--39",
journal = "ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation",
issn = "2167-8375",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discounted Repeated Games Having Computable Strategies with No Computable Best Response under Subgame-Perfect Equilibria

AU - Dargaj, Jakub

AU - Simonsen, Jakob Grue

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Association for Computing Machinery.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - A classic result in computational game theory states that there are infinitely repeated games where one player has a computable strategy that has a best response, but no computable best response. For games with discounted payoff, the result is known to hold for a specific class of games-essentially generalizations of Prisoner's Dilemma-but until now, no necessary and sufficient condition is known. To be of any value, the computable strategy having no computable best response must be part of a subgame-perfect equilibrium, as otherwise a rational, self-interested player would not play the strategy.We give the first necessary and sufficient conditions for a two-player repeated game to have such a computable strategy with no computable best response for all discount factors above some threshold. The conditions involve existence of a Nash equilibrium of the repeated game whose discounted payoffs satisfy certain conditions involving the min-max payoffs of the underlying stage game. We show that it is decidable in polynomial time in the size of the payoff matrix of whether it satisfies these conditions.

AB - A classic result in computational game theory states that there are infinitely repeated games where one player has a computable strategy that has a best response, but no computable best response. For games with discounted payoff, the result is known to hold for a specific class of games-essentially generalizations of Prisoner's Dilemma-but until now, no necessary and sufficient condition is known. To be of any value, the computable strategy having no computable best response must be part of a subgame-perfect equilibrium, as otherwise a rational, self-interested player would not play the strategy.We give the first necessary and sufficient conditions for a two-player repeated game to have such a computable strategy with no computable best response for all discount factors above some threshold. The conditions involve existence of a Nash equilibrium of the repeated game whose discounted payoffs satisfy certain conditions involving the min-max payoffs of the underlying stage game. We show that it is decidable in polynomial time in the size of the payoff matrix of whether it satisfies these conditions.

KW - best response strategies

KW - discounted payoff

KW - Nash equilibria

KW - Repeated games

KW - subgame-perfect equilibria

U2 - 10.1145/3505585

DO - 10.1145/3505585

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85130965183

VL - 10

SP - 1

EP - 39

JO - ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation

JF - ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation

SN - 2167-8375

IS - 1

M1 - 3

ER -

ID: 309122306