Cost-Effective HITs for Relative Similarity Comparisons

Research output: Working paperPreprintResearch

Standard

Cost-Effective HITs for Relative Similarity Comparisons. / Wilber, Michael J.; Kwak, Iljung S.; Belongie, Serge J.

2014.

Research output: Working paperPreprintResearch

Harvard

Wilber, MJ, Kwak, IS & Belongie, SJ 2014 'Cost-Effective HITs for Relative Similarity Comparisons'.

APA

Wilber, M. J., Kwak, I. S., & Belongie, S. J. (2014). Cost-Effective HITs for Relative Similarity Comparisons.

Vancouver

Wilber MJ, Kwak IS, Belongie SJ. Cost-Effective HITs for Relative Similarity Comparisons. 2014 Apr 12.

Author

Wilber, Michael J. ; Kwak, Iljung S. ; Belongie, Serge J. / Cost-Effective HITs for Relative Similarity Comparisons. 2014.

Bibtex

@techreport{1e2eb2a547fd487d8269507a8886989b,
title = "Cost-Effective HITs for Relative Similarity Comparisons",
abstract = " Similarity comparisons of the form {"}Is object a more similar to b than to c?{"} are useful for computer vision and machine learning applications. Unfortunately, an embedding of $n$ points is specified by $n^3$ triplets, making collecting every triplet an expensive task. In noticing this difficulty, other researchers have investigated more intelligent triplet sampling techniques, but they do not study their effectiveness or their potential drawbacks. Although it is important to reduce the number of collected triplets, it is also important to understand how best to display a triplet collection task to a user. In this work we explore an alternative display for collecting triplets and analyze the monetary cost and speed of the display. We propose best practices for creating cost effective human intelligence tasks for collecting triplets. We show that rather than changing the sampling algorithm, simple changes to the crowdsourcing UI can lead to much higher quality embeddings. We also provide a dataset as well as the labels collected from crowd workers. ",
keywords = "cs.CV, cs.LG",
author = "Wilber, {Michael J.} and Kwak, {Iljung S.} and Belongie, {Serge J.}",
note = "7 pages, 7 figures",
year = "2014",
month = apr,
day = "12",
language = "Udefineret/Ukendt",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Cost-Effective HITs for Relative Similarity Comparisons

AU - Wilber, Michael J.

AU - Kwak, Iljung S.

AU - Belongie, Serge J.

N1 - 7 pages, 7 figures

PY - 2014/4/12

Y1 - 2014/4/12

N2 - Similarity comparisons of the form "Is object a more similar to b than to c?" are useful for computer vision and machine learning applications. Unfortunately, an embedding of $n$ points is specified by $n^3$ triplets, making collecting every triplet an expensive task. In noticing this difficulty, other researchers have investigated more intelligent triplet sampling techniques, but they do not study their effectiveness or their potential drawbacks. Although it is important to reduce the number of collected triplets, it is also important to understand how best to display a triplet collection task to a user. In this work we explore an alternative display for collecting triplets and analyze the monetary cost and speed of the display. We propose best practices for creating cost effective human intelligence tasks for collecting triplets. We show that rather than changing the sampling algorithm, simple changes to the crowdsourcing UI can lead to much higher quality embeddings. We also provide a dataset as well as the labels collected from crowd workers.

AB - Similarity comparisons of the form "Is object a more similar to b than to c?" are useful for computer vision and machine learning applications. Unfortunately, an embedding of $n$ points is specified by $n^3$ triplets, making collecting every triplet an expensive task. In noticing this difficulty, other researchers have investigated more intelligent triplet sampling techniques, but they do not study their effectiveness or their potential drawbacks. Although it is important to reduce the number of collected triplets, it is also important to understand how best to display a triplet collection task to a user. In this work we explore an alternative display for collecting triplets and analyze the monetary cost and speed of the display. We propose best practices for creating cost effective human intelligence tasks for collecting triplets. We show that rather than changing the sampling algorithm, simple changes to the crowdsourcing UI can lead to much higher quality embeddings. We also provide a dataset as well as the labels collected from crowd workers.

KW - cs.CV

KW - cs.LG

M3 - Preprint

BT - Cost-Effective HITs for Relative Similarity Comparisons

ER -

ID: 303682923