Determining the Credibility of Science Communication
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review
Documents
- Determining the Credibility of Science Communication
Final published version, 164 KB, PDF document
Most work on scholarly document processing assumes that the information processed is trust-worthy and factually correct. However, this is not always the case. There are two core challenges, which should be addressed: 1) ensuring that scientific publications are credible – e.g. that claims are not made without supporting evidence, and that all relevant supporting evidence is provided; and 2) that scientific findings are not misrepresented, distorted or outright misreported when communicated by journalists or the general public. I will present some first steps towards addressing these problems and outline remaining challenges.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing |
Number of pages | 6 |
Publisher | Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) |
Publication date | 2021 |
Pages | 1-6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Event | 2nd Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing, - oNLINE Duration: 10 Jun 2021 → 10 Jun 2021 |
Conference
Conference | 2nd Workshop on Scholarly Document Processing, |
---|---|
By | oNLINE |
Periode | 10/06/2021 → 10/06/2021 |
ID: 301732098